Search for: "Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co." Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410 (1945), that require courts to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of their own regulations. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am by Brianne Gorod
Seminole Rock & Sand Co., the Supreme Court held that if the “meaning of [an administrative regulation] is in doubt,” “a court must necessarily look to the administrative construction of the regulation. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:36 am by Ronald Levin
Seminole Rock & Sand Co.] in dozens of cases, and lower courts have done so thousands of times. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm by Paul J. Larkin, Jr.
The Supreme Court revisited Seminole Rock and Auer this past term in Kisor v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm by Carley Roberts and Mike Le
Seminole Rock & Sand Co.39 Those opinions held that an agency is uniquely positioned to interpret any ambiguity in its own regulations and, therefore, such interpretations should be afforded controlling deference if reasonable. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Paul J. Larkin, Jr.
Seminole Rock & Sand Co. that courts must accept an agency’s reading of its own rules or other memoranda unless that interpretation conflicts with the rule’s text. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am by Edith Roberts
Seminole Rock & Sand Co., the influential case requiring “courts—generally—” to “defer to an agency’s interpretation of its own ambiguous regulations. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am by John Elwood
Seminole Rock & Sand Co. and Auer v. [read post]