Search for: "Boyle v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Jag
  Rule 16.5  concerns defences, and states that a defendant must state which allegations he admits, denies, and is unable to admit or deny and requires the claimant to prove (a non-admission). [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Paul Ramirez (NU)• Evelyn Atkinson (University of Chicago), "The Right to Bodily Integrity: Pratt v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by John Stigi
Mar. 19, 2014), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Boyle, J.) denied lead plaintiff’s class certification motion in a consolidated action alleging claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Of course, for federal private-prison inmates, suits against the United States directly are out. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
 The farewells to Bird & Bird's (soon to be WilmerHale's) Trevor Cook just keep rolling in and, before the UK IP community's greatest national treasure follows in the footsteps of David Frost and Susan Boyle to "break" America, he has been engaged to enthrall the guests at the Union Dinner Christmas Special on 3 December 2013. [read post]
15 May 2013, 11:44 am by Angela McIlveen
Sec. 6651(a)(1); United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
Orin Kerr states in part two of his comprehensive analysis of Swartz's case that Aaron's Law would not have changed the outcome. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am by Rob Robinson
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
United States, a challenge to the use of a state burglary conviction as a basis for enhancing a sentence for a federal crime under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
11 May 2012, 10:20 am by Steve Vladeck
In short, the crux of the Court of Appeals’ analysis was that the contractors’ various asserted defenses to these state law tort claims (including the central one at issue—federal common law preemption under Boyle v. [read post]