Search for: "Bradford v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…I In that rather esoteric common law jurisdiction known as the United States of America, the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the lower court’s decision that the Universal Life Church has standing to pursue its challenge to a Tennessee law prohibiting persons who have been ordained online from solemnizing marriages:  Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse v Nabors (6th Cir, May 27, 2022). [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Thus, he joined a dissent by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm by Simon Lester
On October 31, the European Union and the United States agreed on temporary measures to settle their dispute over US Section 232 national security tariffs on EU steel and aluminium products. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm by Róisin Á. Costello
In that case, the ECJ was asked to consider the validity of the Standard Contractual Clauses Decision and the Privacy Shield—the two mechanisms under which the data of European citizens were being transferred to the United States under Part V of the GDPR. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” Meanwhile, Section 1226(a) authorizes the detention of an alien “pending a decision on whether the alien is to be removed from the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
United States Ron Darling successfully defended himself from a libel suit filed by his former Mets teammate Lenny Dykstra. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Although some causal claims may be supported by strong evidence of a biological process with mechanistic evidence, such claims are not common in United States tort litigation. [read post]