Search for: "Bradley v. Bradley" Results 1 - 20 of 1,663
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2024, 9:11 am by Dylan Gibbs
SCCChokehold danger is for trial judges, not appeal courtsR. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We note that the Board was entitled to reject claimant's medical evidence even though there was no other medical evidence presented on the issue of causation (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d 1236, 1238 [3d Dept 2019]; Matter of Bradley v US Airways, Inc., 58 AD3d 1043, 1045 [3d Dept 2009]). [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We note that the Board was entitled to reject claimant's medical evidence even though there was no other medical evidence presented on the issue of causation (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d 1236, 1238 [3d Dept 2019]; Matter of Bradley v US Airways, Inc., 58 AD3d 1043, 1045 [3d Dept 2009]). [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:18 am by Giles Peaker
Bradley & Anor v Abacus Land 4 Ltd (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES – apportionment – landlord’s contractual obligation to act reasonably) (2024) UKUT 120 (LC) A requirement in a lease that a landlord act ‘reasonably’ in a exercising a discretion was a requirement for objective reasonableness. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
Repeatedly pressured to “change his story,” the manager – who had been associated with the company for some 28 years – refused to do so and was eventually fired.Believing that such conduct violated the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Just Security
Bradley (@curtisabradley), Jack Goldsmith (@jacklgoldsmith) and Oona A. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:00 am
”The company is also alleged to have failed to take appropriate action in response to complaints.Believing that such conduct was violative of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC filed civil litigation (EEOC v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:00 am
”)Believing that such conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (Title VII), the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"A mere conflict in opinion among physicians is not a ground for disturbing a determination" (Matter of Bradley v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 193 AD3d at 848 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]