Search for: "Bradley v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2009, 9:13 am
The Supreme Court on Friday wiped out a lower court ruling that gave the President the authority to detain indefinitely as terrorism suspects individuals who are living legally  in the United States. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
The Court also asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Nebraska v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm by Ingrid Wuerth
  The Court has held that some international claim settlements agreements other than Article II treaties can be given direct effect in domestic courts, as in cases like United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 8:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
It read, in part: That the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby authorized to issue, on the credit of the United States, one hundred and fifty millions of dollars of United States notes, not bearing interest, payable to bearer, at the Treasury of the United States, and of Denominations, such denominations as he may deem expedient, not less than five dollars each. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:25 pm by Brian Shiffrin
 If there are new instructions or legal principles included in the Court's response, and they are harmful to your case, object, citing this case, and noting that the defense did not have an opportunity to respond to or address those instructions during the trial, and this deprives your client of the rights to due process and a fair trial as protected by the New York State and United States constitutions. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
He was not captured outside the United States, he is not being held at Guantanamo Bay or elsewhere outside the United States, he has not been afforded a CSRT, he has not been 'determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant,' and he is not 'awaiting such determination.' The MCA was not intended to, and does not, apply to aliens like al-Marri, who have legally entered, and are seized while… [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:36 am by David DePaolo
Last week the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in Clement et al v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am by JB
Both are fully available to the United States, and, moreover, the United States is currently employing them. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:01 am by Albéniz Couret Fuentes
For instance, during the debate over the so-called question of imperialism in the immediate aftermath of the Spanish-American War of 1898, in which the United States stripped Spain of its island colonies, in a paper published in the Harvard Law Review, Professor James Bradley Thayer bluntly stated that “there is no lack of power in our nation,—–of legal, constitutional power, to govern these islands as colonies, substantially as England might… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:50 pm by Jacek Stramski
This dispute arose when Bradley Westphal, a firefighter for the City of St. [read post]