Search for: "Bradley v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
He was not captured outside the United States, he is not being held at Guantanamo Bay or elsewhere outside the United States, he has not been afforded a CSRT, he has not been 'determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant,' and he is not 'awaiting such determination.' The MCA was not intended to, and does not, apply to aliens like al-Marri, who have legally entered, and are seized while… [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:36 am
Last week the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in Clement et al v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 9:11 am
The legal question in State of Montana v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 11:15 am
Alexander Gulkarov and United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 11:15 am
Alexander Gulkarov and United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am
Both are fully available to the United States, and, moreover, the United States is currently employing them. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
United States, 642 F. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:24 pm
United States, 425 U.S. 391, 403, 96 S. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:01 am
For instance, during the debate over the so-called question of imperialism in the immediate aftermath of the Spanish-American War of 1898, in which the United States stripped Spain of its island colonies, in a paper published in the Harvard Law Review, Professor James Bradley Thayer bluntly stated that “there is no lack of power in our nation,—–of legal, constitutional power, to govern these islands as colonies, substantially as England might… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:50 pm
This dispute arose when Bradley Westphal, a firefighter for the City of St. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm
Banks look at some of the history of martial law in the United States and say that, while unlikely, it is not impossible that a president facing the situation we now find ourselves in would declare martial law—but it would be wrong to do so. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:32 pm
” People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:44 am
After hearing the motion, the Court directed the file be sent to the United States Attorney for investigation. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:31 pm
The first is whether the United States has sovereign immunity from the suit by virtue of the Quiet Title Act(QTA), 86 Stat. 1176. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:05 am
Supreme Court in MedellÃÂn v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 11:33 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
That amendment provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
