Search for: "Brady v. Board of Review" Results 141 - 160 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
For instance, last summer Under Armour paid Will Ferrell and the crew at Funny or Die to produce a short video, “Tom’s Best Friend”, which featured Under Armour products worn by Patriot’s QB Tom Brady and in the background of the scene, but was more than anything a comedy sketch. [4] However, it was a comedy sketch that prominently displayed the sponsor’s brand of clothing. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Mukasey, No. 071183 Petition for review of decision ordering Ukranian citizen-petitioner to be removed for conviction of an aggravated felony is granted and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision is vacated and remanded where: 1) the BIA decision departed, with insufficient reason, from the legal framework that the court has long used to decide whether an alien charged with removability under 8 U.S.C. section 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) has been convicted of an aggravated felony;… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
When Wareham rises for the defense to argue in response, Trivett illustrates his point, observing that he has just received the defense’s argument slides and asking for a moment to review them. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:23 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 37, 2005 ; and Kinley, David, Nolan, Justine and Zerial, Natalie, The Politics of Corporate Social Responsibility: Reflections on the United Nations Human Rights Norms for Corporations. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Abad, No. 06-0338 Conviction for armed robbery and murder is affirmed based on primary holding that defendant's claim under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. section 3162, is barred by the Act's waiver provision, and not subject to review for plain error under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
This report reviews the Wayfair decision and evaluates existing state laws to determine what further action each state may need to take. [read post]
The provisions in the Hawaii and Pennsylvania constitutions guaranteeing a clean environment are state-created entitlements like the state job in Board of Regents v. [read post]