Search for: "Brady v. Board of Review" Results 161 - 180 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am by Erin Miller
The editorial board of the Washington Post weighs in on the hearings. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Mukasey, No. 071183 Petition for review of decision ordering Ukranian citizen-petitioner to be removed for conviction of an aggravated felony is granted and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision is vacated and remanded where: 1) the BIA decision departed, with insufficient reason, from the legal framework that the court has long used to decide whether an alien charged with removability under 8 U.S.C. section 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) has been convicted of an aggravated felony;… [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 3:45 am by SHG
A 2012 Supreme Court case, Martinez v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
When Wareham rises for the defense to argue in response, Trivett illustrates his point, observing that he has just received the defense’s argument slides and asking for a moment to review them. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Abad, No. 06-0338 Conviction for armed robbery and murder is affirmed based on primary holding that defendant's claim under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. section 3162, is barred by the Act's waiver provision, and not subject to review for plain error under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
This report reviews the Wayfair decision and evaluates existing state laws to determine what further action each state may need to take. [read post]