Search for: "Brand v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2009, 2:35 pm
Brand (University of Pittsburgh - School of Law) has posted Treaties and the Separation of Powers in the United States: A Reassessment after Medellin v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:58 pm
By Andrew Williams -- Today, in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
Mega Brands claims that the trademark registration should be invalidated, which would allow Mega Brands to freely export its products to the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:22 pm
So last Wednesday (March 22, 2017, if you’re joining us late) the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:37 am
In Alabama Power Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 5:46 am
The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday in Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:08 am
Ohio 2002), and whose former Chief Judge held design defect claims for a branded drug preempted four years before Bartlett in Longs v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Couick v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
For more details, see Vampire Family Brands, LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:30 am
Savannah College of Art & Design, Inc. v Sportswear, Inc., 2017 U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The company states that they meticulously develop, manufacture, and market products under various trademarks such as TEMPUR, TEMPUR-PEDIC, and TEMPUR SEALY. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday ruled in a 5-4 split decision in Pliva v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 6:57 am
Many cannabis companies are closely watching the outcome of Gorilla Glue Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:02 am
” In the 1957 case Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 3:31 am
That ruling was handed down in Conte v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:02 am
In T.H. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 3:45 am
In Passport Health, LLC. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 11:40 am
Supreme Court rulings: Pliva Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:40 am
In particular, he took notice of footnote number 2, which states as follow: "Rosetta Stone conducted a brand equity study in February 2009 showing a substantial gap in actual recognition of the Rosetta Stone mark and the closest competing brand. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:28 am
And following the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Azar v. [read post]
