Search for: "Branti v. Finkel" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
Among the significant cases addressing this issue are Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347; Branti v Finkel, 445 US 507 and Rutan v Republican Party of Illi­nois, 497 US 62.* Although the decision does not address Miller’s probationary obligation, "probationary employees" in fact hold permanent appointments and may enjoy limited tenure rights. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:45 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In all probability the US Supreme Court will be asked to consider the Circuit Court's decision in PHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.The decision is posted on the Internet at:https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/B7623651686D60D585258226005405AC/$file/15-1177.pdf [1] Bruso v County of Clinton, 139 AD3d 1166; City Council of Mount Vernon v Batra, 82 AD3d 1224. [2]Branti v Finkel, 445 US 507[3]In some… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:06 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Branti v Finkel, 445 U.S. at page 518.Also, the Court emphasized the significance of the fact that the City Clerk’s position was not tenured -- it carried a two-year term. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:29 pm
In Rutan, the United States Supreme Court extended Branti v. [read post]