Search for: "Brash v. Brash" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2011, 6:37 am by John Diekman
Practice point: A demand to change venue based on the designation of an improper county, pursuant to CPLR 510910, must be served with the answer, or before the answer is served.Student note: Since defendant did not timely serve, he was not entitled to the change of venue as of right.Case: Brash v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:19 am by John Diekman
Practice point: A demand to change venue based on the designation of an improper county, pursuant to CPLR 510[1], must be served with the answer or before the answer is served.Student note: Since defendant did not timely serve, he was not entitled to the change of venue as of right.Case: Brash v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:13 am by Ken Lammers
The absence of “a prior case directly on all fours” here speaks not to the unsettledness of the law, but to the brashness of the conduct. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:17 am by David Markus
That missed the important issue which was the surveillance of the device on the car.The “second case was Riley v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future probably… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future probably… [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:17 am by Lyle Denniston
The House of Representatives sent a young, and sometimes brash Washington lawyer, Erin E. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:30 am
Rossmiller also analyzes the underlying Jones v. [read post]