Search for: "Bratton v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
Automatic termination from public office by operation of lawSchirmer v Town of Harrison, USDC, SDNY, 1999 WL 61843Foley v Bratton, Court of Appeals, 92 NY2d 781 [Decided with Griffin v Bratton]Police officers are public officers and as such a subject to the provisions of Section 30.1 of the Public Officers Law. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:05 am
Reviewing body must have jurisdiction to consider disciplinary appealsMontella v Bratton, Court of Appeals, 93 NY2d 424Although Section 75 of the Civil Service Law sets out what is probably the best-known statutory procedure for initiating disciplinary action against employees in the classified service, other statutory procedures are available for this purpose.* The Montella decision by the Court of Appeals points out the fact that one must consider the basis for the underlying… [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 4:41 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The Delaware Supreme Court recently made its most emphatic negative response to this proposition to date in Lyondell Chemical Company v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am by SHG
Bratton, and the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:15 am by Public Employment Law Press
Distinguishing between an individual's "domicile" and his or her "residence"Campaniello v New York State Div. of Tax Appeals Trib., 2018 NY Slip Op 03400, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFrom time to time an applicant for public employment or an employee is required to be "domiciled"* with the physical jurisdiction of the employer. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
O'Brien, United States Attorney; William J. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:41 am
Further, said the court, "there is no requirement that [Garnes] be notified of the extension of the probationary period, citing Garcia v Bratton, 90 NY2d 991. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Statute of limitations for initiating administrative disciplinary action extended where the act or omission charged may constitute a crimeFolborg v Bratton, 227 A.D.2d 108§75.4 of the Civil Service Law provides that disciplinary proceeding must be initiated "within 18 months of the alleged incompetency or misconduct ... provided, however, that such limitations shall not apply  where the  incompetency  or  misconduct  complained  of … [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 am
Further, said the court, "there is no requirement that [Garnes] be notified of the extension of the probationary period, citing Garcia v Bratton, 90 NY2d 991. [read post]