Search for: "Bravo v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Faculty Lounge, Eric Muller discusses Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:30 am by Eric Muller
At SCOTUSBLOG, Rory Little has written a very good summary of the Supreme Court's first case of the upcoming Term, Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses next Term’s double jeopardy case Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 12:42 pm by Amy Howe
   On October 4, the Justices will hear the first oral argument of the new Term, in Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by John Elwood
Fortune favored the Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
The specific issue in a bribery and public corruption case, Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
The first new relist is Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Supreme Court agrees to review CRST Vans Expedited v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
An interesting decision from the Arizona Court of Appeals last Thursday, in State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:32 am by Jeremy Saland
Contrary to defendant’s contention, expert testimony was not required, inasmuch as ‘opinion testimony by a lay witness is competent to establish the value of the property if the witness is acquainted with the value of similar property’ (People v Sheehy, 274 AD2d at 845; see People v Adams, 8 AD3d at 894; see also People v Bravo, 295 AD2d 213, 214 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 556 [2002]). [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:42 am
  The other New Jersey case from this week, State v. [read post]