Search for: "Bravo v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2014, 8:32 am by Jeremy Saland
Contrary to defendant’s contention, expert testimony was not required, inasmuch as ‘opinion testimony by a lay witness is competent to establish the value of the property if the witness is acquainted with the value of similar property’ (People v Sheehy, 274 AD2d at 845; see People v Adams, 8 AD3d at 894; see also People v Bravo, 295 AD2d 213, 214 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 556 [2002]). [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:42 am
  The other New Jersey case from this week, State v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 8:29 am
The cases are proceeding in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York but ought to be airing on the Bravo network. [read post]
31 May 2014, 8:26 am by Michael Lumer
The cases are proceeding in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York but ought to be airing on the Bravo network. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
Two days later, [he] flew back to the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm by NBlack
State, 103 So.3d 184 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), rev. denied, State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm by Bill Marler
 He did note in his article from the FDA Inspection Report – Observation 2  that Bravo packaged cheese for shipment BEFORE the 60 days had run. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am by Susan Brenner
Bravo, 43 Cal.3d 600 (California Supreme Court 1987)). [read post]