Search for: "Bray v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Because it found that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their challenge, and the balance of equities tipped in their favor, the court enjoined the enforcement of these portions of the executive orders anywhere in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 9:32 am
Bessent case slips too far out of mind, it’s worth recollecting that the district court granted a declaratory judgment against the President of the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2025, 9:37 pm
" United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 5:45 am
The bill must be brought in the Court of the United States, the judgment having been rendered in that Court. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 3:37 pm
United States Dep't of Educ., 681 F. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 12:39 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 4:30 pm
Bray and Paul B. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:26 am
” In its petition for certiorari, DG argued that the Fourth Circuit’s decision conflicts with United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 1:19 pm
Bruen Should Have Said.The post One Way to Read United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
That's contrary to the Supreme Court's decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:13 am
One is the expansion of state standing after Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
" And as Justice Brennan described our system in his opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Furthermore, Story would expressly engage in a discussion of the Constitution's "officers of the United States"-language and "office under the United States" three sections later: in Section 791. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:28 pm
A few weeks ago, Sam Bray wrote a post about Section 3 and "Officers of the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
