Search for: "Bray v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
 Buckley and Citizens United were well covered; a few added McConnell v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 12:37 pm by Danielle D'Onfro
At first glance, Klemm and its amici, including the United States, seem to have the easier argument in the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am by Samuel Bray
Barnette, No. 591, Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1942, at 46. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:51 pm by Samuel Bray
United States, in which the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roberts is pervaded by an argument that the statute, read in the context from which it arose, was "about" something. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Samuel Bray looks at Putnam Investments, LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:00 am by Will Baude
Some kind of civil jury trial right exists today in almost every state, but (I am informed by friend and co-blogger Sam Bray) the scope and exceptions to the requirement differ from state to state. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
United States Surgical Corporation (1984) Simone Degeling and Greg Weeks13. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm by Samuel Bray
That is true for the antebellum United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm by Samuel Bray
That is true for the antebellum United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Ronald M. Levin
Trump’s nominee to serve as the next chair of the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm by Samuel Bray
One could quibble with the Seventh Circuit order, which refers to the injunction as "STAYED as to geographic areas in the United States beyond the City of Chicago" [emphasis added]; footnote 1 of Justice Thomas's opinion is more precise, distinguishing places and parties. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 4:08 pm by Samuel Bray
That statute prescribed fines and prison sentences, and held that all fishing boats and equipment used in violation of the Act "shall be forfeited to the United States. [read post]