Search for: "Bremer v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2013, 3:11 pm by The Federalist Society
To discuss the case, we have Emily Bremer, who is an Attorney Advisor to the Administrative Conference of the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:11 pm by The Federalist Society
To discuss the case, we have Emily Bremer, who is an Attorney Advisor to the Administrative Conference of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm by The Federalist Society
Bremer’s views are her own and do not necessarily represent the views of the Administrative Conference of the United States or it members. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm by The Federalist Society
Bremer’s views are her own and do not necessarily represent the views of the Administrative Conference of the United States or it members. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:30 am by Christopher Walker
We argued that, in both the old and new world, agency head final-decisionmaking authority remains the standard (and preferred) model—something the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:10 pm by Susan Schneider
Randi Roth, Court-appointed Monitor in the landmark race discrimination case against the United States Department of Agriculture, Pigford v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Emily S. Bremer
Bremer is an attorney advisor for the Administrative Conference of the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am by Geoffrey
Bremer GmbH v. ets Soules et Cie and Anthony G Scott [1985] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 160 Disputes arose in connection with Bremer’s sale of US soya bean meal to Soules. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:14 pm by ERIC J DIRGA PA
Image via Wikipedia Bremer v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 11:20 am by Gene Takagi
IRS (Complaint) challenges the right of the IRS to collect donor information on Schedule B of the Form 990, asserting both the IRS’s failure to keep such information confidential and the Constitutional issues (chilling of association and assembly rights) – a completely expected outcome of the Supreme Court decision in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]