Search for: "Brenizer v. Brenizer"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 11:12 am
The Froseths further contend that Brenizer’s offer of judgment was deficient, thereby precluding a costs award, because the [...] [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:29 am
Brenize, of Macht, Brenizer & Gingold, P.C., of Syracuse, represented the wife. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
We conclude that plaintiffs, in opposition, raised a triable issue of fact whether the continuous representation doctrine applied to toll the statute of limitations with respect to the malpractice claim insofar as it related to the 2014 loan transaction (see generally Carbone v Brenizer, 148 AD3d 1806, 1807 [4th Dept 2017]). [read post]
