Search for: "Brett M. Kavanaugh" Results 441 - 460 of 698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2018, 1:01 pm by NCC Staff
On Saturday afternoon, the Senate voted to confirm Brett M. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 10:40 am by Lesley Wexler and Colleen Murphy
Has Judge Brett Kavanagh’s confirmation become a referendum on the #MeToo movement? [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 9:36 am by Howard Bashman
Brett Kavanaugh Cannot Have It Both Ways: As the former dean of Yale Law School, I’m shocked by the judge’s partisan turn. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:31 pm by Lyle Denniston
Brett Michael Kavanaugh is all but certain to win final approval as a Justice by the Senate on Saturday, probably by the closest vote in modern history, after a bitter culture war and partisan skirmish in that chamber. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 12:35 pm by Erin McCarthy Holliday
The US Senate voted on Friday morning to end discussion and advance Brett M. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 8:11 am by Howard Bashman
And Seung Min Kim and John Wagner of The Washington Post report that “Senate votes to advance Supreme Court nominee Brett M. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:02 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Lee la carta Un grupo compuesto por más de 2,400 profesores de diversas escuelas de Derecho, firmaron una carta en la que se oponen al nombramiento del nominado juez Brett Kavanaugh al Tribunal Supremo de Estados Unidos. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:51 am by David Markus
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens on Thursday said that high court nominee Judge Brett M. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Seung Min Kim and John Wagner report that “Supreme Court nominee Brett M. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:18 pm by Howard Bashman
“FBI report fails to calm Kavanaugh chaos”: Stephen Dinan and Alex Swoyer of The Washington Times have an article that begins, “The FBI’s updated background investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett M. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 11:22 am by Tom Smith
I’m grateful because Trump has not backed down in the face of the slipperiness, hypocrisy and dangerous standard-setting deployed by opponents of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
It was always unnerving, but never enough so to make me decide to stop.In my most recent Verdict column, “What Kavanaugh Could Have Said, But Didn’t: ‘I Honestly Don’t Know What Happened, and I’m Willing to Accept the Senate’s Judgment,’” I offered an imagined letter that Brett Kavanaugh could have written that would have put his drinking in perspective. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:08 pm by Howard Bashman
“As FBI background check of Kavanaugh nears its end, probe appears to have been highly curtailed”: Matt Zapotosky, Robert O’Harrow Jr., Tom Hamburger, and Devlin Barrett of The Washington Post have an article that begins, “The FBI background check of Brett M. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
The Senate is currently engaged in a dispute over whether to approve federal appeals court judge Brett M. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
For The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that “[i]n the wake of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s angry testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, some commentators are predicting that if confirmed, he may face calls for recusal in a range of cases,” and lists “four categories of cases that have been mentioned as recusal triggers for Kavanaugh,” concluding that recusal is… [read post]