Search for: "Brewer v. Brewer"
Results 1 - 20
of 753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:28 am
— via The Chief Organizer Blog Google cuts team of contractors who went on strike — via The Verge Few Large Employers Have Changed Abortion Coverage Following Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:07 am
New York's efforts to punish the National Rifle Association, at issue before the Supreme Court in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Much of the research he presents "has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:49 am
Michael Brennan discussing Biden v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
The Court stressed that its decision in Brewer v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
Brewer maintained that regulations which destroyed the use of property effectively deprived the owner of his property. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 9:38 am
Note that I consulted with William Brewer, Sarah Rogers, and Noah Peters of Brewer Attorneys & Counselors on the petition, and look forward to consulting further with them and with Cole (with whom I've much enjoyed working in the past) on the merits briefs.The post NRA and ACLU Teaming up on the First Amendment in <i>NRA v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
And Gundy v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
Here's my post on the petition, from March, though you can read all the filings here: [* * *] William Brewer, Sarah Rogers & Noah Peters of Brewer Attorneys & Counselors and I filed a petition earlier this month asking the Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit decision in NRA v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:22 am
In many if not most of these cases, the pre-amendment provision retains at least some of the protections found in Section 417 (b)’s default rule against adverse impact on the non-consenting members, as illustrated in a case decided earlier this year called Gallagher v Crotty. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:50 am
The case is captioned Gambrill v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
For example, in DeHoog v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm
Pabst The new Guidelines cite U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:19 pm
"); Brewer v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
[54] New Classic Cases – Falstaff The new Guidelines cite U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:50 pm
" (Note: William Brewer, Sarah Rogers & Noah Peters of Brewer Attorneys & Counselors and I are the counsel on the petition.) [read post]