Search for: "Brian Tamanaha"
Results 61 - 80
of 567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2011, 12:06 pm
Brian Tamanaha (Washington U.), How Law Schools are Helping the Elite: The top schools, with some variation, distribute scholarships roughly along these lines: 50% of the students pay full fare, 25% get a discount of half or more, 25% get less than half off, and a handful of students enjoy... [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:39 am
Brian Tamanaha (Washington U.), The Depth and Breadth of Misleading Employment Numbers by Law Schools (And How to Solve It): It is by now well known that law schools have been posting misleading employment numbers. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:12 pm
Orin Kerr (George Washington), Brian Tamanaha’s Failing Law Schools: Brian’s basic argument is that law schools have been on an unsustainable path fueled by the ready availability of student loans, the cartel power of the ABA, and the influence of the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:47 pm
It includes reviews of Brian Tamanaha's Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging; Barry Friedman's The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution; and William J. [read post]
8 May 2007, 7:05 pm
At Balkinization, Brian Tamanaha offers some "straight talk on tenure" in law schools.... [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:00 am
The economic model of law schools is broken, says Brian Z. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 7:15 am
Here is the abstract: This is a review essay discussing Brian Tamanaha’s book BEYOND THE FORMALIST-REALIST DIVIDE (Princeton University Press, 2010). [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 11:05 am
Following up on Friday's post, Law School Rankings by Debt Load Per Graduating Student: Balkinization, The Quickly Exploding Law Graduate Debt Disaster, by Brian Tamanaha (Washington U.): The average indebtedness figures for 2011 law graduates are stunning. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 11:25 am
Brian Z. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 11:02 am
At Balkinization, Brian Tamanaha has an interesting post on common misunderstandings of Legal Realists. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:05 pm
The National Law Journal reviews the new book by Brian Tamanaha (Washington U.), Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, June 15, 2012): "This is not a career-enhancing book, and people early on told me not to write it for that reason," Tamanaha said before the book's June 15 release.... [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:00 am
Robert Steinbuch (Arkansas-Little Rock) reviews the new book by Brian Tamanaha (Washington U.), Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) in the National Law Journal: Tamanaha does not seek to indict law schools. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 7:40 am
Brian Z. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:51 am
Here is the abstract: This essay considers Brian Tamanaha’s “Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide,” a book which takes aim at one of the most deep-rooted jurisprudential dichotomies of the last century: the concepts of legal formalism and legal realism. [read post]
INSTAVISION: My interview with Brian Tamanaha, author of Failing Law Schools, is now available on Y…
1 Jun 2012, 5:59 am
INSTAVISION: My interview with Brian Tamanaha, author of Failing Law Schools, is now available on YouTube. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:06 am
BRIAN TAMANAHA: A Proposal for Imposing Fiscal Restraint on Law Schools. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:26 am
AT INSIDE HIGHER ED, an interview of Brian Tamanaha about his Failing Law Schools. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:32 am
Following up on yesterday's post, Tamanaha: UC-Irvine's Original Sin: Chasing Prestige at the Expense of Public Service: Erwin Chemerinsky (Dean, UC-Irvine), A Response to Brian Tamanaha: Brian Tamanaha criticizes me and UCI Law School for making the choice to create a top 20 law school. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 8:31 am
Over at Balkinization, Brian Tamanaha tallies up the "winners" and "losers" in the trend toward increasing stratification and debt in the law school and law firm settings. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:01 am
They are both quite compelling.)Brian Tamanaha has yet another provocative, interesting post on what is wrong with legal education:The accreditation process is justified as the means to insure a quality legal education so that the public will be served by competent lawyers. [read post]
