Search for: "Bridge Company v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 311
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  (Source: here ) No contingency fee system:  Contingency fee arrangement has been one of the distinguishing features of litigation in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  While performing its obligations under the company’s contract with Austin Bridge, Hayward incurred higher-than-expected cement costs, which the River Authority refused to reimburse the company for. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:46 am by Matthew Rizzolo
United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893), for example, the Court held that the government had to pay just compensation when it took away a company’s public franchise to take tolls on a bridge. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” NECA “is a leading provider of collectible figures, games and game equipment in the United States and abroad. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
City of New London and New London Development Company, 843 A2d 500 (Conn. 2004), cert. granted, 125 S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
City of New London and New London Development Company, 843 A2d 500 (Conn. 2004), cert. granted, 125 S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
" You learn something new every day.Robert Brauneis and Anke Moerland's recent article argues that it would not be good policy to allow the company that distributes siggi's ® yogurt to trademark the name SKYR for yogurt in the United States, even though most people in the United States do not currently know what the word "skyr" means. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
" You learn something new every day.Robert Brauneis and Anke Moerland's recent article argues that it would not be good policy to allow the company that distributes siggi's ® yogurt to trademark the name SKYR for yogurt in the United States, even though most people in the United States do not currently know what the word "skyr" means. [read post]