Search for: "Bridges v. County of Los Angeles" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
(Congratulations to Deputy Federal Public Defender Gail Ivens, Los Angeles, CA)   United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
CAFA has prompted a flurry of single-state class actions filed in state courts, and recent statistics show that in at least one forum favored by the plaintiffs’ bar (Los Angeles), state class action filings continue to grow. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]