Search for: "Bridges v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 5:06 pm
• The panel reached another split decision - 2 to 1 - "finding that although appellant could reasonably be found to have been engaged in a rescue, the bridge collapsed because of intervening circumstances not attributable to Finazzo," • Then both the trial court and Superior Court affirmed, although one judge, Judge Donohue, dissented from the Superior Court's majority opinion. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:06 am
  (And I also agree with the caveat by the Court of Appeal that if she's sanctioned, and refuses to pay the sanctions, there may be trouble with enforcing the sanction unless we modify the order to refer to her real name, but that we can cross that bridge if and when we come to it.)The Court of Appeal also adds an interesting footnote, which reads:  "In Elizabeth Luster's briefs, she repeatedly refers to Doe as an 'alleged rape victim.'… [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
Taiwan and Manhattan’s Foley Square are separated by 7,874 miles, and Taiwanese citizen Meng-Lin Liu couldn’t bridge the distance in federal court. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
The recent decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in A.B. v C.D. v E.F. offers a couple of troubling conclusions with respect to the rights of children and whether determining the presence of family violence requires proof of intent not prescribed by statute. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:42 am by Minken Employment Lawyers
This question was addressed in the recent Ontario Superior Court decision of Arnone v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 11:48 am by NARF
Examining the implications of Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:59 pm by Cal Law
Superior Judge John Munter emphasized in his ruling in Luquetta v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:15 am by Shahram Miri
Such is the exact scenario of a recent court case originating from Contra Costa County Superior Court, Case # MSP0900615. [read post]