Search for: "Bridges v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Williams-Sonoma * California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) * Ninth Circuit: FACTA Does not Cover Emailed Receipts — Simonoff v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:11 am by PaulKostro
On a determination of abuse or neglect, N.J.S.A. 9:2-18 allows agencies to file a complaint in the Superior Court seeking the termination of parental rights. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 11:18 am by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
Richard Warshak's counter-parental alientation programme, was at the centre of last month's controversial Ontario Superior Court decision on parental alienation in A.G.L. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 9:26 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Illinois Supreme Court has announced that tomorrow morning, October 18, it will file opinions in six civil cases: No. 112064 - Pielet v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:19 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Repeat.Psychologists met in secret with Bush officials to help justify torture: reportConrad Black loses bid to have Supreme Court of Canada hear case over millions in back taxesB.C. teachers lose latest court fight on class size, compositionTen shocking details from the report on sexual misconduct in Canada's militaryExpert witnesses need not be independent, Supreme Court rulesProvince defends right to lay polygamy charge in Bountiful caseObese Canadians should be… [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 6:32 pm by Mark Murakami
Superior Court Does jury decide reasonable likelihood of imposition of exaction in eminent domain case? [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 12:10 pm by Editor
International Court of Justice (ICJ) Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:57 am by CMS
Citing Canada Trust v Stolzenberg (No 2) [1998] 1 W.L.R. 658 and Bols Distrilleries v Superior Yacht Services [2006] UKPC 56, [2007] 1 W.L.R. 12, the court found in favour of the claimant and decided that the Oak Liability had been transferred to Novo Banco, which had thereby become bound by the English jurisdiction clause in the Facility Agreement and as a result, the English courts had jurisdiction under article 25 of the Judgments Regulation to… [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2022-2023update.html One petition for certiorari was granted on 1/13/23: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
In December 2019, the Supreme Court granted review in County of Butte v. [read post]