Search for: "Bridges v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2016, 2:37 pm by Ann-Therese Schmid
Federal Highway Administration Also at the end of 2015, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an opinion in United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Works International Union, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey and involves the extent to which federal fraud statutes cover the politically motivated acts of public officials. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will consider whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:30 am by DONALD SCARINCI
United States, the criminal case arising out of New Jersey’s infamous “Bridgegate” scandal. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (06-7517), Bridge v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:10 am by Jeffrey Kahn
United States, described what happened next: “[Abel] was taken to a local administrative headquarters and then flown in a special aircraft to a special detention camp over 1,000 miles away. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:29 pm by Kenneth Anderson
Relatively few scholars seek to bridge the gap in fundamental legal views, but Kimberly N. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis    On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am by Conor McEvily
Joe Palazzolo of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog reports that Antoine Jones, the respondent in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
  As the Brennan Center has noted, state critical infrastructure laws borrow from the federal concept of critical infrastructure: segments of the economy “so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect” on national security and public safety, thereby deserving enhanced legislative protection. [read post]