Search for: "Bridges v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 1,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 7:09 am by PaulKostro
United States Steel Corp., 15 N.J. 301, 311 (1954)]. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am by Susan Brenner
  Gaona–Gomez admitted he was a Mexican national and was in the United States “without the proper immigration documents. [read post]
12 May 2014, 1:38 pm by INFORRM
The Advocate General stated that ‘an economic operator must be considered a single unit…[and] not be dissected on the basis of its individual activities related to processing of personal data’. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a fraud prosecution stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey, arguing that “[i]f the Court chooses to apply the logic of Department of Commerce v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 4:20 pm
United States (07-330), Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 12:04 pm
United States (and related cases), regarding “escape” under the Armed Career Criminal Act; * No. 07-210, Bridge v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:49 pm
Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 512 (1984) (citation omitted); see also Eckenrode v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:27 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
” Even more intriguing is that, although he did this sensitive work within the United States, there was nothing in the record showing that the United States government was aware of his activities, and he had no diplomatic or other official credentials. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:46 am by Josh Wright
” “According to the department, without the judicially monitored restrictions, Google’s control over this key asset “would have substantially lessened competition among providers of comparative flight search websites in the United States, resulting in reduced choice and less innovation for consumers. [read post]