Search for: "Bridges v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 1,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2019, 6:29 am by Peter Margulies
One of the INA’s mandatory bars denies asylum to a foreign national who en route to the United States passes through a country with which the United States has a safe third country agreement. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:54 pm
The OPT then will be extended to October 1, and the individual will be permitted to remain in the United States and continue working without interruption. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:59 am
The OPT then will be extended to October 1, and the individual will be permitted to remain in the United States and continue working without interruption. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am by Susan Brenner
  Gaona–Gomez admitted he was a Mexican national and was in the United States “without the proper immigration documents. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:09 am by PaulKostro
United States Steel Corp., 15 N.J. 301, 311 (1954)]. [read post]
12 May 2014, 1:38 pm by INFORRM
The Advocate General stated that ‘an economic operator must be considered a single unit…[and] not be dissected on the basis of its individual activities related to processing of personal data’. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a fraud prosecution stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey, arguing that “[i]f the Court chooses to apply the logic of Department of Commerce v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:27 am by Jordan Brunner
The move is a radical departure from the policy of the Obama administration and also of numerous European allies of the United States, and comes as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday that Assad’s fate “will be decided by the Syrian people. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 4:20 pm
United States (07-330), Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 12:04 pm
United States (and related cases), regarding “escape” under the Armed Career Criminal Act; * No. 07-210, Bridge v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:49 pm
Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 512 (1984) (citation omitted); see also Eckenrode v. [read post]