Search for: "Briggs v. Hughes"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Briggs gave the main judgment, with which Lord Thomas agreed. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah, who all work within the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down last week by the UK Supreme Court in the matter Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51, which has significant implications for the UK competition law collective proceedings (or class actions) regime. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Briggs LJ, however, strongly dissented. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
Mr Hoskins QC states that it does. 14:37: Lord Briggs questions whether there may be cases where equality is equity and that equality of distribution is fair. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
He says that it was not correct of Mr Harris QC to say that much of the evidence has already been gathered to support their methodology. 1235: Mr Hoskins QC says Mr Harris QC’s proposed methodology does not reveal what is practicable at certification stage. 1232: Lord Briggs asks if ‘preferability’ is different to ‘commonality’ in the Canadian legislation. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
On 13 and 14 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in the most important defamation case if the year – Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
2 May 2010, 11:47 am
Justice Briggs in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division considered this issue in Key & Anor v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm
Following the judgment there was confusion at the Patent Office.Rose Hughes (photo: Neil Graveney)Rose Hughes focused on plausibility. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
Cathryn Houston, trainee solicitor at CMS, considers the case of Navigators Insurance Company Limited and others v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA (formerly Bnavios-Navegacao LDA), which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on Tuesday 20 March 2018: On 20 March 2018, the UK Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, Lord Briggs) will hear this appeal relating to the interpretation and interplay between clauses of the… [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:17 am
Starting on 9 December 2015 the case was heard over two days by a panel of five, consisting of Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Sumption and Lord Briggs. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am
In R v Briggs-Price the House held that if prosecutors wished to introduce alleged benefit from offences not proved at the trial they would have to do so to the criminal standard. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:57 am
Lord Hodge (on behalf of Lady Hale, Lord Hughes and Lord Lloyd-Jones) delivered the majority view, with only Lord Briggs dissenting. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The claimants, who include the Duke of Sussex, Guy Ritchie, Hugh Grant and Doreen Lawrence, sought to add further evidence to their claim, including 235 stories which appeared in the Sun and News of the World between 1994 and 2016. [read post]
15 May 2021, 8:51 am
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 340 (1986), citing Butz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 7:27 am
Belden Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
In Regeneron v Kymab (IPKat post here), a patent was found enabled and thus sufficiently disclosed despite the example methods provided in the specification being unworkable at the time of the invention. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review, heard 23 Oct 2018. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review, heard 23 Oct 2018. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:39 am
., v. [read post]
