Search for: "Briggs v. State of California" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2017, 1:52 pm
The First District has the following pro tems helping out until October:Judge Jeffrey Horner, of the Superior Court of the State of California, Alameda County, will be sitting pro tem judge in Division Three until October 23, 2017.Judge John William Kennedy, of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa, will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Four until October 13, 2017.Also of note: Lawyer Groups Urge Congress To Not Split 9th Circ.And yes, it's over 120… [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
 The University of California Press has published Reproduction Reconceived: Family Making and the Limits of Choice After Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm by Lovechilde
San Quentin State Prison 40 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:10 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  Habeas is denied if the state appellate court's deferential review of the trial court is at least reasonable.Briggs v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 11:02 am by Kent Scheidegger
  It divided 5-2 on the interpretation of the five-year limit and on the provision that allows superior court decisions in habeas corpus cases to be appealed to the intermediate courts of appeal rather than the state supreme court.The case is Briggs v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
United States Denton’s Privacy and Cybersecurity law Blog has analysed California’s much debated California Consumer Privacy Act 2018. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
” The Data Protection Report notes that Nevada, New York and other states are following California’s CCPA. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
"   This means that, if the amendment is construed literally, California could become a same-sex marriage mill for couples from other states, and in at least a handful of other states that lack state DOMAs or anti-marriage constitutional amendments, those marriages could be recognized -- perhaps. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:26 pm by CJLF Staff
  Bob Egelko of the SF Chronicle reports that the plaintiffs in Briggs v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986), should be reconsidered or clarified? [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
 (2)  Whether United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
United States, 10-8659, Garcia v. [read post]