Search for: "Briggs v. State of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2017, 1:52 pm
The First District has the following pro tems helping out until October:Judge Jeffrey Horner, of the Superior Court of the State of California, Alameda County, will be sitting pro tem judge in Division Three until October 23, 2017.Judge John William Kennedy, of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa, will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Four until October 13, 2017.Also of note: Lawyer Groups Urge Congress To Not Split 9th Circ.And yes, it's over 120… [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:21 am
Briggs, a state senator. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
(A California case, Aikens v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 9:30 pm
The University of California Press has published Reproduction Reconceived: Family Making and the Limits of Choice After Roe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Briggs v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
San Quentin State Prison 40 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Dunson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:10 am
" Habeas is denied if the state appellate court's deferential review of the trial court is at least reasonable.Briggs v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 11:02 am
It divided 5-2 on the interpretation of the five-year limit and on the provision that allows superior court decisions in habeas corpus cases to be appealed to the intermediate courts of appeal rather than the state supreme court.The case is Briggs v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
United States Denton’s Privacy and Cybersecurity law Blog has analysed California’s much debated California Consumer Privacy Act 2018. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
” The Data Protection Report notes that Nevada, New York and other states are following California’s CCPA. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:41 am
State of California ex rel. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:55 am
Comin and Briggs v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
" This means that, if the amendment is construed literally, California could become a same-sex marriage mill for couples from other states, and in at least a handful of other states that lack state DOMAs or anti-marriage constitutional amendments, those marriages could be recognized -- perhaps. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
California, 505 U.S. 437, 439 (1992); see State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:26 pm
Bob Egelko of the SF Chronicle reports that the plaintiffs in Briggs v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986), should be reconsidered or clarified? [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
United States, 10-8659, Garcia v. [read post]
