Search for: "Bright v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 3,182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2011, 3:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
About six weeks ago, I blogged about the Army Court of Criminal Appeals' July decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:08 am by Florian Mueller
Today the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a motion by Verizon, the American Association of Advertising Agencies and the Ford Motor Company to participate in the September 11, 2013 hearing on the Apple v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
As summer concludes and the federal bureaucracy returns to their Washington offices, the fall-out from SCOTUS' United States v Windsor decision continues. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
This is the so-called Fifield rule, stemming from a 2013 First District Appellate Court case that appeared to set forth a bright line. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:00 am by Shaun Marker
In the forthcoming weeks, I will write about the other cases consolidated in this decision. 1Igbara Realty Corp. et. al v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:35 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Supp. 2d 147, 165 (D.Me. 2010) (close question whether a “very bright” eight-year-old was sufficiently mature to invoke exception); Rodriguez, 817 F.3d at 478 (11-year-old); Garcia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
Background Under ARPA, state governments are in line to receive $195.3 billion in Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Funds, which can be used for four enumerated purposes, and which specifically cannot be used to cut state taxes. [read post]