Search for: "Bright v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 3,301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
This is the so-called Fifield rule, stemming from a 2013 First District Appellate Court case that appeared to set forth a bright line. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:35 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Supp. 2d 147, 165 (D.Me. 2010) (close question whether a “very bright” eight-year-old was sufficiently mature to invoke exception); Rodriguez, 817 F.3d at 478 (11-year-old); Garcia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:00 am by Shaun Marker
In the forthcoming weeks, I will write about the other cases consolidated in this decision. 1Igbara Realty Corp. et. al v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
Background Under ARPA, state governments are in line to receive $195.3 billion in Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Funds, which can be used for four enumerated purposes, and which specifically cannot be used to cut state taxes. [read post]
26 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Aurora Barnes
Livingwell Medical Clinic, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:50 am by Will Baude
Sunstein, Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory State, 103 Harv. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:32 am by Victoria VanBuren
Concepcion and the Bright Side of the Force (May 2, 2011) GUEST-POST PART II| AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:17 pm
  Now, that's not a bright-line rule, and there are other opinions that hold that interrogations remain custodial (and thus require Miranda warnings) even when officers said the exact same thing. [read post]