Search for: "Bright v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 3,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Buckingham
Supreme Court overruled 50 years of precedent to eliminate the “physical presence” bright-line rule for substantial nexus in its South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by ASAD KHAN
 Nnyanzi v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 18 confirmed the distinction that permission to “settle”, as opposed to permission to stay pending determination of applications, erases the bright-line between a precarious and a secure immigration status. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 4:24 pm by Lyle Roberts
In Parkcentral Global Hub Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am by Zachary C. Jackson
  This month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected Fifield’s bright line test in the case of Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:03 am by SHG
After the 9th Circuit’s en banc ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 8:44 am
This is a very good opinion, with the 9th, courtesy of a visiting judge, providing a Bright-line.US v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:40 am by Steve Bainbridge
Supreme Court unanimously decided, in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:50 am by Danielle Citron
The Supreme Court’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:47 pm by Brian Van Vleck
In Bright v. 99 Cent Only Stores, the Second Appellate District reversed the dismissal of a cashier's claim for penalties because her employer failed to give her a place to sit while she was working. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 5:53 am by Daily Record Staff
We are asked to consider whether appellant’s civil action, filed within the one-year statute of limitations, but later voluntarily dismissed following appellees’ removal of the case from state to federal court, can be re-filed in the state and escape the bar of the statute of limitations. [read post]