Search for: "Bright v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 3,063
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2017, 2:52 pm by Giles Peaker
A similar argument was rejected by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, ex p. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:06 pm
CAAF's unanimous opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:07 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In the recently published Bright v. 99¢ Only Stores, the California Court of Appeal held that an employee could sue her employer, 99¢ Only Stores, for failure to provide “suitable” seating during her employment. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 5:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
**Of the matter of --bright-line rule -- cases, it is true that the Supreme Court rejected a bright-line rule proposed by the CAFC in Festo. [read post]