Search for: "Bright v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 3,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Andrew Kent
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:46 am
From the days of Geoffrey through 2011, the states were largely victorious in corporate income tax nexus cases involving "foreign" holding companies. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:54 pm
The Dallas Court of Appeals recently held that the answer to this question is yes; however, the Court based its decision on the specific facts of the case and not on a bright-line rule. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:47 pm
” By contrast, a group of former top Justice Department officials, ex-prosecutors at the federal and state level, and former judges asked the Court in  an amici brief to keep the Jackson decision intact, saying it had provided a “bright-line rule” that has now become “embedded in routine police practice,” just as the warnings requirement of Miranda v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 8:10 am by Eric S. Solotoff
In August 2013, I blogged several times about the Appellate Division’s decision Gnall v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:38 am by Kristin E. Hickman
United States and his concurring opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:36 am
" The State of Georgia for over 100 years has decided to draw a bright line distinction between a claim flowing from a physical injury to claims flowing purely from shock, horror, fear or harassment. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 10:30 am by IPWatchdog
Todd Dickinson of Polsinelli, Judge Theodore Essex of Hogan Lovells, Retired Chief Judge Paul Michel, and Robert Stoll of Drinker Biddle discussed the Supreme Court case eBay Inc. v. [read post]