Search for: "Brill v. Brill" Results 121 - 140 of 220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Brill & Gregory Peters, ed., Forthcoming).Todd J. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 3:36 am by Rumpole
 Scott Warfman and Penny Brill for the State and Charlie White and Bruce Fleisher for the defense. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:30 am
Limits on ability to audit or question the bills you receive are greatly curtailed, see State CA v Sutter Health & MultiPlan. 3. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the defendants' cross motion was made more than 120 days after the note of issue was filed and, therefore, was untimely (see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648), an untimely cross motion for summary judgment may be considered by the court where, as here, a timely motion for summary judgment was made on nearly identical grounds (see Grande v Peteroy, 39 AD3d 590, 592; Lennard v Khan, 69 AD3d 812, 814; Bressingham v Jamaica Hosp. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am by Kenneth Vercammen
Since, as the parties agree, there is no genuine issue of material fact, the matter was ripe for summary judgment as involving only a question of law, Brill v. [read post]