Search for: "Brinker v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 9:20 am
Kraweloc’s co-counsel, Michael Rubin, responded that the decision would have retroactive effect, pursuant to controlling United States Supreme Court authority. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 11:17 am
United States Bank National Assn., 203 Cal. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm
However, as the case approached trial, the United States Supreme Court reversed a grant of class certification in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm
Such a head-scratching, impractical rule cannot be reconciled with the United States Supreme Court’s class action decisions in cases such as Wal-Mart v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:52 am
Posted by Greg MersolIn the wake of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:04 pm
See United Steelworkers v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:07 pm
As predicted, the United States Supreme Court’s analysis in McCutcheon v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
The dissent brings to mind Justice Werdegar's concurring opinion in Brinker v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) As anticipated, today the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 1:42 am
.* As Bilski is to patent lawyers, Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:09 am
Barrows v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm
Liu's nomination to the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals by President Barrack Obama was effectively blocked by Senate Republicans who criticized Mr. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court reversed a Class Certification order in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm
Brinker Affirms Continued Vitality of Wage and Hour Class Actions Oil refinery workers and ConocoPhillips Co. settled meal break claims for $15 million in United Steelworkers v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
The Wang II decision follows a remand from the United States Supreme Court which had reversed the original Wang judgment in light of the inconsistencies between the lower courts' rulings and the certification standards the Supreme Court announced in Dukes v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm
After the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
In one the defect alleged involves mold, in the other the control unit. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Compare Appellant's Brief at 2-29 with United States v. [read post]
