Search for: "Brinker v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 9:20 am by webmaster
Kraweloc’s co-counsel, Michael Rubin, responded that the decision would have retroactive effect, pursuant to controlling United States Supreme Court authority. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm by H. Scott Leviant
However, as the case approached trial, the United States Supreme Court reversed a grant of class certification in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm by Rebecca Blaw
  Such a head-scratching, impractical rule cannot be reconciled with the United States Supreme Court’s class action decisions in cases such as Wal-Mart v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:52 am by Greg Mersol
Posted by Greg MersolIn the wake of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm by Thomas Kaufman
By Thomas Kaufman  (follow me on Twitter) As anticipated, today the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 1:42 am
.* As Bilski is to patent lawyers, Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm by AALRR
Liu's nomination to the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals by President Barrack Obama was effectively blocked by Senate Republicans who criticized Mr. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm by req@quintilone.com
  On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court reversed a Class Certification order in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Brinker Affirms Continued Vitality of Wage and Hour Class Actions Oil refinery workers and ConocoPhillips Co. settled meal break claims for $15 million in United Steelworkers v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:00 am by Thomas Kaufman
  The Wang II decision follows a remand from the United States Supreme Court which had reversed the original Wang judgment in light of the inconsistencies between the lower courts' rulings and the certification standards the Supreme Court announced in Dukes v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am by Greg Mersol
  But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Compare Appellant's Brief at 2-29 with United States v. [read post]