Search for: "Briscoe v. LaHue" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
Claims under Federal and State Racketeering Acts And Other Civil Remedies There are three types approaches to civil remedies a defendant might pursue to inhibit the flow of false claims in products cases. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Anjelica Cappellino
The United States Supreme Court reiterated the importance of witness immunity in Briscoe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 6:00 am by Todd Hatcher
This principle was later reinforced by the Supreme Court in Briscoe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:41 am by Timothy Coates
  Paulk asserted that just as a witness at trial is entitled to absolute immunity under Briscoe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:26 am by Timothy Coates
  Paulk moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that in Briscoe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
The dispute among lower courts is over how to reconcile two Supreme Court rulings: Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 4:38 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
The Appellate Court reasoned as follows: "The Supreme Court has recognized that the common law provides for absolute immunity for judges (see Briscoe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:24 am by Jon
BauerDefenses: Qualified official immunityPrivate-Law Models for Official Immunity, by Richard EpsteinTort - Defamation - Elected Official Immunity, by Edward WesoloskiThe Case Against Official Immunity, by Jesse WalkerAbsolute Immunity on Trial, by Radley BalkoSupreme Court rules witnesses cannot be sued under 1983 for the content of their testimony - Briscoe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:03 am by Michael O'Hear
  The Court has previously held that grand-jury witnesses benefit from absolute immunity for their testimony, Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Here’s the issue in the case:In Briscoe v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:28 pm
In the panel's view, the Supreme Court's decision in Briscoe v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:36 am
  In the panel's view, the Supreme Court's decision in Briscoe v. [read post]