Search for: "Britt v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2010, 5:25 am
In South Pacific Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:58 am
c=2&pdf=41626 [4] Id. [5] Britt v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:41 am
See Britt v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
Pa. 2014) (Second Amendment), Britt v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 4:55 am
Britt’s argument is based on the Supreme Court’s holding in Holmberg v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
(As Wikipedia explains, a few U.S. states define themselves as “Commonwealths”, rather than “States. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:59 am
United States (argued February 23, 2016). [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:14 pm
The case was Britt v Superior Court. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Brady v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:24 am
State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 2:06 am
Plaintiff must also “show that the attorney was the proximate cause of his or her conviction” (Britt v Legal Aid Socy., 95 NY2d 443, 446 [2000]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350-351 [2012]). [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:08 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
As another example, this one from the Virginia Supreme Court in Britt Construction v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 12:25 am
As another example, this one from the Virginia Supreme Court in Britt Construction v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:47 am
Playboy commissioned nude photographs of one Britt Dekker, to be published in the December 2011 edition of the magazine. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:22 am
The court observed that under Britt v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm
For the one other recent state appellate case recognizing some felons’ right to keep and bear arms, see this discussion of Britt v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:45 pm
Today, the IRS issued Notice 2014-19, which provides guidance on how qualified retirement plans should treat the marriages of same-sex couples following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:58 am
The best statement of the rule is that a wrong-doer is responsible for the natural and proximate consequences of his [or her] misconduct' " (Battalla v State of New York, 10 NY2d 237, 240; see Derby v Prewitt, 12 NY2d 100, 105-106). [read post]
