Search for: "Britton v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2019, 9:30 pm
It’s U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019).Jedediah Britton-Purdy[*]This long post sketches two thoughts prompted by time with the wide-ranging, provocative, and fecund letters that make up Democracy and Dysfunction. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:19 am
Super. 2013); Britton v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 1:45 pm
Camelot Guardian Management Ltd v Khoo (2018) EWHC 2296 (QB) (Not on Bailii for some reason. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:53 am
Redding, Britton A. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:48 am
In Hicks v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 6:51 am
As stated in the 1997, 5th Circuit opinion styled, Riner v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 3:52 am
Britton Sorensen contributed to this article. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
See Britton v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:48 am
” Hively v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Court of Appeal decision In overturning the decision of first instance, Lord Justice Clark (with whom Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Patten agreed) relied on the following reasons: In reviewing the case law regarding contractual interpretation (Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Gan Insurance Co Ltd v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] CLC 1, 103 being particularly significant) it can be said that “the clearer the language the less appropriate it may be to… [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
The facts of Arnold v Britton neatly illustrate this. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:13 am
The Facts of the Case In the recent case of Britton v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:03 pm
Britton v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Britton Greene, William S. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The Court’s reluctance last year to interfere with parties’ freedom of contract is also apparent in the contractual interpretation case of Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36 (Case Comment here). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:22 pm
Comment The UT here seems to have reached a resolution – at least for itself – of Sella, Assethold, Francis and Arnold v Britton. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:24 am
The test which has replaced it is whether a stated remedy in a contract is proportionate to the legitimate interests of the innocent party. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:20 am
In the present case, Neuberger stated that the reasonable reader of clause 3(2) would see the first half of the clause as descriptive and the second half as a qualification of the service charge. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
