Search for: "Brooks v. Hill" Results 81 - 100 of 224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2018, 3:40 am by IAN SKELT
It has never been in dispute that the police can be liable in tort to those injured as a direct result of acts or omissions by the police: see, for example Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [1989] AC 53, [59B-C]. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
The first is the concern, articulated in X v Bedfordshire in relation to social services and in Hill v West Yorkshire in relation to the police, that liability in negligence will complicate decision-making in a difficult and sensitive field, and potentially divert the social worker or police officer into defensive decision-making. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 2:53 am by Walter Olson
” [David Brooks] Yes, courts have often found a constitutional right to discriminate, so scratch that Masterpiece Cakeshop talking point [Eugene Volokh] Fugitive Kentucky lawyer and disability-fraud king Eric Conn arrested in Honduras [Bill Chappell/NPR, earlier here and here] As White House belatedly consults, heeds seasoned counsel, lawsuits against travel ban begin running out of steam [Ilya Shapiro, The Hill] Cheers for restoring schools’ discretion to serve… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post   That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro Sasae,… [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Mark Sherman and Sadie Gurman at the Associated Press, Ariane de Vogue and Laura Jarrett at CNN, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Adam Liptak in The New York Times, Pete Williams at NBC, Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed, Brooke Seipel at The Hill, BBC News, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, and Richard Wolf at USA Today. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Among the contents: Roger Pilon on Scalia’s originalism; Andrew Trask on the class action case of Tyson Foods v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am by Rishabh Bhandari, Jordan Brunner
Adam Schiff’s remarks at the Brookings Institution last Tuesday. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am by Jamie Baker
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
The Hill reports that further documentation will be required from companies interested in bidding on the project later this month. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 5:50 am by Justin S. Daniel
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In Prawfsblog, Jack Preis discusses Manuel v. [read post]