Search for: "Brooks v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Treaty Rights; Indian Taxation) United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:38 am
This, however, is not one of those.Plaintiffs-Appellants—a lawyer, his law firm, and associated parties—urge creative arguments to avoid their bank’s compliance with Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) summonses for their account records. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am
Sweden’s carbon tax revenues are significant but have been decreasing slightly over the last decade. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:20 am
A subscription to LAW.COM is needed for online access to this service. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another, heard 21 -22 February 2011. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
The Destination Test was largely utilized until 1954, when I.R.C. section 502 changed the perspective of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). [read post]
Illinois Court Sets Elements for Retaliatory Discharge Under False Claims Act in Partnership Dispute
9 Sep 2016, 9:25 am
Donald’s fellow partners had expressed their displeasure with him for taking it upon himself on several occasions to contact third parties, such as Memorial and the Internal Revenue Service, to discuss billing and other matters concerning Associated, without the authorization of the other partners. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am
Brooks (11-898), Agarano v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:59 pm
Its initial claim was denied by the Internal Revenue Service last year. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
In Brooke and its companion case of Matter of Estrellita A. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm
Comey, came to the Brookings Institution today to give a speech that was moderated by Lawfare’s own Benjamin Wittes. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
TheCTA exempts twenty-four kinds of entities from its reporting requirements,including banks, insurance companies, and entities with more than twentyemployees, five million dollars in gross revenue, and a physical office in the UnitedStates. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
Department of the Treasury, in a joint statement with Austria, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, announced it would no longer impose retaliatory tariffs on these five countries for their use of taxes on company revenues from digital services that would impact large U.S. tech companies. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
‘No-cost Intellectual Property marketing and brokerage services with revenue-sharing component upon license execution’ (IAM) Juries and IP damages: a random and unsettling factor? [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
