Search for: "Brooks v. Martin" Results 1 - 20 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm by Giles Peaker
Kazadi v Martin Brooks Lettings Estate Agents Limited & Faparusi, Edmonton County Court 14 May 2015 Thanks to Legal Action September 2015 Housing law updates for this one. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
A high-profile week at the Leveson Inquiry, with evidence from Rebekah Brooks, the MailOnline editor Martin Clarke and Andy Coulson (see Natalie Peck’s Inforrm roundup). [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:40 am
The State's theory at trial was that the tracks observed by Martin were made by the ATV taken in the ATV case.State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 11:52 am
Bonafé, Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean Jed Odermatt, Council of the European Union v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:22 pm
Dueling Suits Between Firm, Ex-Partner Are Dismissed [New York Law Journal via Am Law Daily] Pitcock v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
   The other five defendants – Rebekah Brooks, Stuart Kuttner, Charlie Brooks, Cheryl  Carter and Mark Hanna – we acquitted on all charges. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Recent Historical Stories on Constitution Daily Looking back at a key Supreme Court decision about gay rights The real-life namesake of Martin Sheen’s ‘West Wing’ president Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 3:59 pm by Zosha Millman
Now let’s dive into today’s top 10: Martin Shkreli, Criminal Forfeiture, and the Wu-Tang Clan – David Smyth of Brooks Pierce writing out of Raleigh, NC on his blog Cady Bar the Door When a customer harasses your employee – what should you do? [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hence, he failed to show that any negligence on defendants' part proximately caused him to recover less than he was otherwise entitled to (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]