Search for: "Broome v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 10:34 am by MBettman
Justice Frankfurter’s concurrence found that the Eighth and Fifth Amendments were not applicable to states, a position that has since been rejected. ) United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:00 am by Janet Lindenmuth
The Jacob Broom House in 1975 Jacob Broom,  a modest and hardworking businessman, is one of the least known signers of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:45 am by admin
  Judge Frost did give everyone a big hint – he’s stated that he doesn’t see how Broom can circumvent the decision made by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and denied review by the United States Supreme Court earlier this week in the Biros case. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:45 am by Terry Lenamon
  Judge Frost did give everyone a big hint -- he's stated that he doesn't see how Broom can circumvent the decision made by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and denied review by the United States Supreme Court earlier this week in the Biros case. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:40 am by Evan Brown
The court noted that the injunction prohibited “[a]dvertising, soliciting, marketing, selling, offering for sale or otherwise using in the United States the [applicable product trade dress] in connection with any garden broom products. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
Legislative intent controls in applying personnel rules providing for the liquidation of sick leave accruals upon separation from serviceCounty of Broome v Badger, 2008 NY Slip Op 08230, decided on October 30, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentInitially the Broom County Legislature adopted a personnel rule setting out the payment that would be made to administrative employees [i.e., unrepresented personnel within the meaning of the Taylor Law] for unused sick time… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
Contracting out a negotiating unit's work Vestal Employees Asso., NEA/NY v Vestal CSD, 94 N.Y.2d 409 Management may attempt to “contract out” work claiming that to do so is more efficient or less expensive or because the tasks are “too technical” for its employees to perform. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:31 am by Steve Hall
The decision was an exception to the United States Supreme Court decision in April 2008 in Baze v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
Brennan of the United States Supreme Court stated in Furman v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:56 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which they will consider whether a co-conspirator can be held independently liable for forfeiture of the proceeds of a drug conspiracy. [read post]