Search for: "Browder v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2023, 11:08 am by Bob Ambrogi
In March, the Illinois law firm, MillerKing brought the putative class action against DoNotPay on behalf of “all law firms in the United States,” alleging false association and false advertising under the federal Lanham Act and Illinois state law. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 1:26 pm by Morgan Cloud
Other alleged acts involved entities and property in the United States. [read post]
In 2018, Russia’s abuse of the Interpol system led Spanish police to temporarily detain Browder in Madrid. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:30 am by Kelly Goles
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1981-1999), Johnson presided over critical civil rights cases of the 1950s and 1960s such as Browder v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am by Russell Spivak, Benjamin Wittes
Think only of how hard it was to resolve the cross-border data transfer issues between the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:27 am by davidferriero
District Court in the District of Columbia, and Archivist of the United States David S. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Ed Stein
(As discussed in an earlier post, some argue that the review provision runs afoul of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:15 am by NCC Staff
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Thus, to state a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must allege two elements: (1) a deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States, and (2) that `the deprivation was caused by a person acting under color of state law. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am by SHG
Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 671 (1983), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that the due process and equal protection principles of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibit ‘‘punishing a person for his poverty. [read post]