Search for: "Brown v. Barry" Results 21 - 40 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2020, 6:46 am by Lynn Kirwin
Brown, in Bank of Montreal v Fabish, a commercial litigation case, called upon members of the judiciary and counsel to make greater use of modern information technologies in court. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 5:19 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
This discussion group will also address other issues related to reproductive rights, including Roe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:22 am
This article explores fiction works like Breaking Bad and the book Room and shows how aspects of those works appear in actual cases, such as the United States Supreme Court prison-overcrowding case, Brown v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 10:20 pm
 Barry discussed the Court of Appeal decision of Madore-Ogilvie v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
See also South Hetton Coal Co v North-Eastern News Association [1894] 1 QB 133; Jones v Halton [1909] 2 KB 444; Browne v DC Thomson & Co [1912] SC 359; Irish People’s Assurance Society v City of Dublin Assurance Company Ltd [1929] IR 25 (SC); Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116, [1944] UKHL 1 (03 April 1944); Awolowo v Zik Enterprises… [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:13 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
A great deal more opposition and ambivalence greeted Brown than is revealed by such a tale of moral triumph. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the position of Barry George, who, along with JUSTICE, was granted permission to intervene). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am by Barry Friedman
”  Front and center in Bickel’s critique was Brown v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 8:18 pm
Barry Barnett The feed we call our own relishes the DQ brown derby. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]