Search for: "Brown v. Boyd" Results 21 - 40 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Even post-Civil War and post-Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:35 am by John McFarland
” Justice Hecht wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices Green, Johnson, Boyd and Devine. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:12 pm by emagraken
It is trite to state that no two injuries and no two plaintiffs are the same (Boyd v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:56 am by Kali Borkoski
Boyd School of Law Thomas Stipanowich – Pepperdine University School of Law Nancy Welsh – Penn State Dickinson School of Law [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 8:37 am
Dadante    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08b0016n.06 In re: Arthur Boyd, Jr. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Boyd Professor of Law at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas Boyd School of Law. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Brian Shiffrin
As study after study has showed, residence, especially in urban centers, can be the most accurate predictor of race” (United States v Bishop, 959 F2d 820, 827-828 [9th Cir 1992]).Subsequently, however, in Boyde v Brown, (404 F3d 1159, 1171 [9th Cir 2005]) either sharply limited or overruled this holding:It may be unpersuasive for a prosecutor to use residence without attempting to tie it to the facts of the case. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am by MOTP
JUSTICE JOHNSON filed an opinion, concurring in part and dissenting in part, and concurring in the judgment, in which JUSTICE LEHRMANN, JUSTICE BOYD, and JUSTICE BROWN joined. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm by Sam Wong
Biden nominated Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson as a Justice of the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am by Steve Worrall
Browning, Browning & Smith LLC, Marietta, and Stephen C. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am by Steve Worrall
Browning, Browning & Smith LLC, Marietta, and Stephen C. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
Their frequent arguments for “church autonomy,” a doctrine the Supreme Court has never embraced, are dangerous for the next generation of children, will keep parents in the dark, and are antithetical to the common good.Controversy 2: The Attack on the Right to Equality in Medical TreatmentThe Supreme Court recently denied certiorari in Minton v. [read post]