Search for: "Brown v. Commonwealth" Results 61 - 80 of 279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2021, 1:31 am by Chloe Pettiti
Brown Rudnick is a tradename of both Brown Rudnick LLP, a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (“BR-USA”), and its affiliate Brown Rudnick LLP, a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC300611 (“BR-UK”). [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:56 pm by cdw
(covered last week without citation) Brewington & Brown v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am by admin
Can be considered in child custody (See Brown v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
  Georgia declared implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:21 am by Florence Campbell Jones
The recent case of Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13 clarified the English law position that a principal cannot be vicariously liable for the acts of an independent contractor. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 10:25 pm
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 12) [2009] NSWSC 714 Justice Gzell of the New South Wales Supreme Court refused to exonerate the former James Hardie directors and executives who contravened section 180(1) Corporations Act in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11)[2009] NSWSC 287 relating to their approving the content of the Draft ASX Announcement at the February 2001 board meeting and related matters. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Health Care Reform: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE DERAILS PART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:05 pm
In the Norfolk County Superior Court case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 5:30 pm by Josh Blackman
The report also identifies a flurry of massive resistance legislation enacted after Brown v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]