Search for: "Brown v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
In re Vermont Permanency Initiative, Inc., 2023 VT 65. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm by John Elwood
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, filed an opinion dissenting from the denial of certiorari, arguing that the U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held that a group called “Feds for Medical Freedom” could challenge that requirement in federal district court, despite the provisions of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 channeling federal employees’ challenges to adverse personnel actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board, subject to review by the U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
However, I don’t expect his “expert” services will be in high demand going forward LOL. * * * Arkansas Act 689 of 2023 NetChoice LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am by Kristi L. Wolff and Jaclyn M. Metzinger
Let’s get started… NAD Best in Show NAD evaluated whether flea and tick medications were fairly compared via a television advertisement reminiscent of the beloved film Best in Show. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
Class – The employer does not offer a major medical plan to the same “class” of employees who are eligible for the ICHRA reimbursement. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
Brown, 18-1203, the news service seeks to revisit that decision, arguing that the U.S. [read post]