Search for: "Brown v. Elliott" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2014, 2:03 pm by Celia Rooney
Anya Proops, for 11KBW’s Panopticon Blog, has considered the significance of the case of Browning v IC and DBIS and particular issues that may arise when secrecy is asserted in freedom of information cases here. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
ELLIOTT, AND KANE RUSSELL, COLEMAN & LOGAN, P.C.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-05-01013-CV, 241 SW3d 689, 12-13-07)08-0084 MCALLEN HOSPITALS, L.P., ET AL. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Outboard Marine Corp., 584 So.2d 447, 450 (Ala. 1991); Elliott v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Brown v The Scottish Ministers (Scotland), heard 14-15 Jun 2017. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm by Mark Beese
Brown, Director of Marketing and Business Development, Meagher & Geer PLLP David Brown, Editor in Chief, National Law Journal Cari Brunelle, Vice President, Jaffe Associates John Buchanan, Chief Marketing Officer, Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin John M. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 11:30 pm by Jo Moore
” (see Cain v Francis [2008] EWCA Civ 1451 §73 ; Hartley v Birmingham City Council [1992] 1 WLR 968, pg 980; McDonnell v Walker §21-22)  Prejudice to the Defendant involves asking whether the Defendant has been disadvantaged in the investigation of the claim and/or the assembly of the evidence in respect of issues of both liability and quantum”(see Cain v Francis §73). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail on… [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 2:19 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
A claim is ‘arguable’ if ‘there is an arguable case that a ground for seeking judicial review exits which merits full investigation at a full oral hearing with all the parties and all the relevant evidence’ (for which see Sharma v Browne-Antoine [2006] UKPC 57, para 14(4)). [read post]