Search for: "Brown v. Illinois State Police" Results 121 - 140 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 04, 2008 State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
United States Sarah Palin has lost her libel claim against the New York Times. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
Abuse & Neglect: SUIT CLAIMS RESIDENT'S CANCER WENT UNNOTICED AT 2 ILLINOIS FACILITIES, Parks v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
But Governor Brown knows better than anyone what a costly failure the state’s death penalty system has been. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Senate contests like Sherrod Brown’s in Ohio and Jon Tester’s in Montana. [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:30 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
 She is the author of Disrupting Kinship: Transnational Politics of Korean Adoption in the United States (University of Illinois Press, 2019) and co-editor of Degrees of Difference: Reflections of Women of Color on Graduate School (University of Illinois Press, 2020). [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]